FOOTWEAR CIRCULARITY

Around 23.9Bn shoes are produced globally each year, they are often made using over 60 different components from a range of different materials including TPU, EVA, PU and rubber. The industry faces significant challenges due to this high complexity of shoe construction. This combined with a low collection rate, results in a vast majority of discarded footwear ending up in landfills. Fashion for Good sees the need to address this challenge and focus on laying the foundation for footwear circularity as well as accelerating innovation.

What’s the challenge?

The diversity of constituent materials makes footwear disassembly and recycling very challenging – some footwear is made with over 60+ materials. Scaled technology does not exist that can deconstruct footwear into its composite parts – creating a mixed waste stream. Around 95% of used footwear goes to landfill or incineration. There are many factors that must be considered when thinking about material usage for footwear, especially adhesives – e.g. in sports shoes they need to be able to tolerate flexural stresses and present high comfort and durability.

What do we hope to achieve by working in this area?

Fashion for Good is doubling down their work in this space, building on their existing projects including the Fast Feet Grinded pilot, which tests and validates Fast Feet Grinded’s footwear recycling process. Expanding  on existing workstreams Fashion for Good will collaborate with our footwear focused partners, including adidas, Inditex, ON, PVH Corp., Reformation, Target, and Zalando.

How do we address this area?

To effectively address the challenges in footwear sustainability, Fashion for Good identified the key intervention points across the shoe lifecycle and structured work into four core workstreams:

  • Design – Defining circular design in the footwear space and collectively driving guidelines to build a circular infrastructure

  • Materials – Scouting and validating sustainable alternatives for footwear materials including TPU, PU, EVA, leather, and rubber

  • End of Use: Sorting, Disassembly, & Recycling – Developing a comprehensive data set on post-consumer footwear waste flows, including (non-)rewearable fractions, volumes, construction and composition. As well as scouting and validating solutions for repair,  end of use, disassembly and recycling of footwear

  • Traceability – Laying the foundation by amalgamating a footwear traceability data protocol to build traceability for evidence to substantiate sustainability claims

Relevant Innovators

FAQ's

Why is footwear circularity especially challenging compared to apparel?

Footwear is built from a large number (often 60+) of heterogeneous materials (TPU, EVA, PU, rubbers, textiles, adhesives) tightly bonded together, making disassembly, sorting, and recycling technically and economically difficult. Moreover, collection and reverse‑logistics systems for shoes are far less developed than for garments.

What is the current scale of the problem in terms of waste?

Globally, about 95 % of used footwear ends up in landfill or incineration. Annually, around 23.8–24 billion pairs of shoes are produced, a massive stream of product that has limited circular end-of-life pathways.

What are the main intervention points Fashion for Good is focusing on?

FFG defines four core workstreams:

– Design: establishing circular design guidelines specific to footwear to enable repair, disassembly, and recycling

– Materials: scouting and validating sustainable alternatives (e.g. bio‑based, recyclable materials) for soles, uppers, adhesives, etc.

– End-of-use: Sorting / Disassembly / Recycling: mapping waste flows, developing sorting and disassembly methods, validating recycling technologies

– Traceability: building a footwear-specific data protocol so the composition, lifecycle, and claims can be tracked reliably

What are promising technological innovations in footwear recycling?

– Mechanical recycling of footwear components into granulates or secondary materials (e.g. for flooring, sheet goods) — especially for open-loop uses.

– Debondable adhesives / delamination methods to separate layers more cleanly, enabling better material recovery.

– Mono-material or fewer-material shoe architectures to simplify recycling pathways.

– Automated sorting / spectral analysis / AI to classify shoe types or material composition ahead of disassembly.

How can brands or manufacturers engage in this space?

– Align on circular design principles and integrate them into product development

– Commit to pilot or validate new materials and recycling systems

– Provide offtake or demand signals to innovators working on end-of-use technologies

– Participate in collective initiatives like Closing the Footwear Loop

– Help establish or support reverse logistics, takeback systems, and collection infrastructure

What is the “Closing the Footwear Loop” initiative?

– A collaborative project led by Fashion for Good, bringing together multiple brands (e.g. adidas, Inditex, Target, Zalando) to transform the linear footwear model into a circular one.

– It includes mapping European footwear waste flows, developing circular design guidelines, and validating end-of-life solutions.

– The initiative aims to provide a roadmap for circularity in the footwear sector and test technological innovation at scale.

What metrics or standards exist (or are needed) for footwear circularity?

– Currently, no universally accepted definition or metric for “footwear circularity” exists, which hampers alignment across the industry.

– There is a need for standardisation of how to measure durability, recyclability, material safety, disassembly potential, and lifecycle impacts.

– Traceability and data protocols (tracking materials, versions, lifecycle data) will be essential to validate claims.

What are the biggest barriers to scaling footwear circularity?

– Technical difficulty in disassembling complex multi-material assemblies and adhesives

– High cost and risk associated with new recycling technologies

– Weak or absent collection, sorting, and takeback infrastructure

– Lack of demand or market for recycled footwear materials

– Fragmented industry incentives, low standardisation, and lack of alignment among stakeholders

What roles can investors and NGOs play?

Investors: finance pilots, demonstration plants, scaling of recycling infrastructure, blended finance for first-of-kind facilities

NGOs / civil society: advocate for policy incentives or regulation (e.g. extended producer responsibility for shoes), push for standardised definitions and transparency, monitor implementation

– Both can help convene cross‑industry collaborations and promote open innovation, data sharing, and sectoral alignment