Behind the Break

Behind the Break

09/12/2025

Behind the Break is a multi-phase research initiative developed by Fashion for Good in collaboration with The Microfibre Consortium. The project takes a research-led approach to advance the fashion industry’s understanding of fibre fragmentation, addressing uncertainties in existing testing protocols and key knowledge gaps. By supporting the development of a more credible and consistent foundation, the initiative aims to enable stakeholders to make informed decisions and take decisive action to mitigate fibre fragment pollution, while leveraging the best available science.

Behind the Break 1.0

Behind the Break 1.0 was a collaborative research project conducted between 2024 and the end of 2025. It addressed the lack of clarity around existing test methods by:

  • Identifying differences and best use cases across methods
  • Assessing data variability between labs and testing approaches
  • Evaluating the role of advanced techniques in understanding fibre loss
  • Determining contamination levels within samples

Building on The Microfibre Consortium’s Microfibre Data Portal—which houses data on finished fabrics to better understand root causes—the study also identified key variables influencing fibre loss. These were isolated across three fabric archetypes (cotton knit, cotton woven, and polyester knit) using a controlled design of experiment.

Behind the Break 2.0

Behind the Break 2.0 builds on the findings from Phase 1.0, with a focus on reducing data variability across laboratories using The TMC test method, deepening knowledge on fibre fragmentation across key fabric archetypes and expanding supplier engagement to support existing workstreams on root causes. The project is structured across four workstreams:

  • A multi-lab Round Robin to identify variations in testing practices that contribute to data variability
  • Pilot exploration on the the introduction of a multifibre fabric for calibration purposes to improve data consistency
  • Comparative assessment of PU bonding vs. lock-stitch methods within the sample preparation 
  • Fabric-specific focus groups to consolidate existing knowledge and define priorities for future research, along with development of onboarding materials for suppliers.

Innovation Partners

Project Partners

Implementation Partners

Relevant Resources

FAQs

What is fibre fragmentation and why is it important in the textile industry?

Fibre fragmentation is the process of fibre loss from a textile product during its life cycle and / or through its subsequent breakage in the natural environment. Understanding fibre fragmentation is important for the fashion and textile industry because fibre loss occurs at multiple stages of a textile’s life cycle, and once released, fibre fragments can move within and between different environmental compartments. They have now been detected in almost every ecosystem on Earth — including marine and freshwater environments, terrestrial habitats, air, biota, and even within human bodies.

How was the 'Behind the Break' fibre fragmentation project designed, and why is it considered a landmark study?

The project is considered a landmark study because it brought together more than ten brand, manufacturing, and research partners to generate foundational insights that can guide future work on fibre fragmentation. It was carried out in two phases; Phase 1: An 8-part workshop series with leading experts to inform a comprehensive report on the current state of fibre fragmentation across seven key pillars (including test methods, solution portfolios, toxicity, and regulation); Phase 2: An experimental study comparing existing test methods and assessing the root causes of fibre loss across three fabric archetypes using a controlled design of experiments.

What did the 'Behind the Break' project reveal about test methods for measuring fibre shedding?

The study tested a range of existing methods for assessing fibre loss into water, including gravimetric, visual, and fibre characterisation techniques, to enable comparisons. It showed that each method can serve valuable and distinct purposes depending on accessibility, the protocols used, and the level of data granularity required by the user. The study also found that overall trends were consistent across methods, meaning reliable conclusions can be drawn when comparing fabrics, and that contamination within samples was minimal.

What did the 'Behind the Break' project reveal about the causes of fibre shedding in the three fabric archetypes that were tested in the study?

For each fabric archetype, two to three variables were selected and tested in isolation. The results provided directional insights into how each variable affects fibre loss into water. For example, in both Cotton Knit and Polyester Knit samples, the dyeing method had a significant impact on shedding, particularly when Water Jet dyeing was used. However, the study also highlighted that a larger and more diverse sample set is needed to draw conclusive findings and fully understand how variables interact across fabric types. This underscores the complexity of providing clear recommendations for design and supply chain teams to reduce fibre shedding.

What are the future implications of the 'Behind the Break' project for reducing fibre fragmentation in the fashion and textile industry?

  • Provided a clearer mapping of the industry’s current position on fibre fragmentation across multiple pillars, offering recommendations for future research and collaboration.
  • Clarified differences between existing test methods, supporting users in selecting the most appropriate methods based on the testing purpose and data required. 
  • Increased confidence in the approach and data collected in existing databases, such as the Microfibre Data Portal, currently used to identify the root causes of fibre shedding. 
  • Generated insights that the industry can use to begin integrating fibre fragmentation considerations into future design and manufacturing guidelines, supply chain decision-making, and broader sustainability strategies.

Other Projects

    •  
      End of Use
    •  
      Transparency & Traceability
    clothes on hangers

    Sorting for Circularity Rewear

    Fashion for Good expanded its Sorting for Circularity framework to address the challenge of sorting for rewearable textiles to understand better their resale potential and the demand across the second-hand market. We launched an 18-month initiative in January 2024 in collaboration with Circle Economy, brand partners adidas, Inditex, Levi Strauss & Co. and Zalando to enhance the sorting of rewearable textiles using innovative AI technologies. The project seeks to improve garment recovery for resale, promoting circularity in the fashion industry.

    •  
      Raw Materials
    •  
      Processing
    •  
      Manufacturing & Retail
    •  
      End of Use
    •  
      Transparency & Traceability
    • Report

    Behind the Break 2.0

    28/04/2026

    Behind the Break 2.0 is a targeted research initiative focused on addressing fibre fragmentation in textiles, building directly on the work started in Phase 1.0 (2024–2025), which tested the strengths and limitations of different methods used to measure fibre loss, identifying how much results vary between labs, and exploring what drives fibre shedding across three fabric types: cotton knit, cotton woven, and polyester knit. Phase 2.0 seeks to increase confidence in data quality, consolidate and refine existing testing approaches and knowledge across selected fabric archetypes, and deepen supplier engagement to support wider data collection within the space.

    •  
      Raw Materials
    •  
      End of Use

    Feedstock Activation Europe: FAE

    Project FAE (Feedstock Activation Europe) is an initiative led by Fashion for Good to channel post-consumer textiles as feedstock for  textile-to-textile recycling at scale. It addresses a core gap in the value chain: today, sorters cannot viably prepare post-consumer material at the price, quantity and quality recyclers require, leaving most non-rewearable textiles with no viable destination.